The chart uses daily closes adjusted by the available provider. There may be delays, gaps or differences versus the official source.
Company
Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. operates as a critical materials and technology company. The company provides rare earth magnet-related products; battery metals production; and other recycling operations.
Sector Basic Materials · Other Industrial Metals & Mining
The stock fell 11.8%, but we could not identify which news caused it.
Reason for discarding
The drop is not explained by recent news. No cumple la ventana temporal exigida o el motor de causalidad no confirma un catalizador reciente.
What did look good
Unclear: we could not find what caused the drop. We found no recent event whose timing lines up with the drop.
We could not measure the overshoot, because there is no public figure for this catalyst's real damage.
Out of our 10 checks, 1 come out clearly in favour.
Final score: 18 out of 100.
What would have to change to consider it again
Se reactivaria como candidato si que se confirme un catalizador principal dentro de la ventana temporal exigida; que el checklist de subsanabilidad supere el minimo exigido (actual 1/10, minimo 7/10); que aparezca una fuente real que permita cuantificar el impacto del catalizador.
What the confidence percentage means
Careful: this 90% does not say the stock will go up. It is the reliability of the source that confirmed the catalyst (an official SEC filing). Since almost every candidate is detected from an official SEC filing, this number repeats a lot.
Verified data: 5 of 10 checks have real data.
Detection analysis
This structured block did not exist yet for this historical page.
Where the score comes from
The score is computed by Python code from objective data, not by the AI model, and it does not change after the qualitative research.
Raw score18.2Data coverage77.5%
Points not measurable today: 22.5 out of 100.
Coverage-adjusted score23.5
The adjusted figure does not replace the real score or the ranking. It only visually corrects how much of the 100 points was actually measurable, so missing data is not confused with weak quality.
Fixable problem3.8 / 25
How much of the problem behind the drop looks fixable
Company strength0.0 / 20
Revenue, margins, cash and debt before the drop
Overreaction size0.0 / 15
How much it fell beyond the estimated real damage
Company response7.5 / 15
Whether management responded publicly after the drop
Chart support0.0 / 10
Whether the price holds above its 50-day average
Institutional money0.0 / 10
Large-fund buying: no reliably up-to-date source exists
Bonus points+7.0
Insider buying, capitulation volume, analysts keeping their rating
Penalty-0.0
Deteriorating sector and negative signals detected
out of 10018.2
The 10 checks (1 clearly in favour)
Each line is a question the system tries to answer with a real figure. "No data" means there is no reliable source to answer it, not that the answer is bad.
CheckAnswerWhat it is based on
El catalizador es puntual y no estructuralNotemporal_causality_status='unclear', deteccion='max_drawdown_over_60m_candles_48h_market_window'.
El FCF sigue positivo o en tendencia positivaNofree_cashflow (TTM)=-61732752; sin dato trimestral mas reciente.
El guidance anual se mantiene o no ha sido emitidoNo dataYahoo no expone guidance corporativo propio, solo revision de consenso de analistas (ver criterio 10).
La direccion ha comunicado respuesta al problemaPartlySolo 6.0h desde el inicio de la caida: aun dentro del plazo habitual de respuesta.
El balance aguanta sin necesidad de capitalNonet_cash=-22292000 negativo y deuda elevada.
Los insiders no han vendido de forma agresivaNo dataSin net_shares_purchased_pct (Yahoo netSharePurchaseActivity).
La caida supera el impacto cuantificable del eventoNo dataSin impacto cuantificable disponible (solo earnings/guidance tienen fuente cuantificable hoy).
El sector no esta en deterioro estructuralYesXLB change_1m=0.52%.
Hay precedentes de recuperacion post-eventoNo dataSin historico de eventos de caida previos por ticker en esta base de datos todavia.
El consenso no ha recortado estimaciones mas de un 10%No dataSin consensus_revision_pct (Yahoo earningsTrend).
Company indicators
Precio
Variación en 1 día-8.21%
Variación en 5 días-7.65%
Variación en 1 mes+12.27%
Variación en 3 meses-54.52%
Acciones negociadas ese día2,944,723
Volumen medio de 10 días1,279,080
Sirve para comparar: si el volumen del día lo dispara, algo ha pasado
Tamaño
Valor en bolsa1.88 B$
Lo que cuesta comprar todas las acciones de la empresa
Valor de la empresa entera2.07 B$
Valor en bolsa más la deuda y menos la caja: lo que costaria comprarla y saldar deudas
Valoración
Veces caja libre (EV/FCF)-33.50x
Lo mismo, pero contra el dinero que la empresa genera de verdad
Negocio
Margen bruto9.4%
De cada 100 dolares vendidos, lo que queda tras el coste directo del producto
Margen operativo-744.9%
Lo que queda de cada 100 dolares vendidos tras todos los gastos del negocio
Caja libre generada (12 meses)-61.73 M$
Dinero que sobra tras pagar gastos e inversiones. En negativo, la empresa quema caja
Deuda
Caja disponible5.25 M$
Deuda total27.55 M$
Caja neta-22.29 M$
Caja menos deuda. En positivo, la empresa tiene más dinero que deudas
Accionistas
Acciones emitidas621,800,646
Acciones que cotizan libremente141,733,239
Cuanto menor sea, más bruscos suelen ser los movimientos de precio
Parte en manos de directivos87.1%
Si los que dirigen la empresa tienen mucho invertido, se juegan lo mismo que tu
Apuestas bajistas sobre el free float0.8%
Porcentaje de acciones prestadas para apostar a la baja
Why some numbers are coloured and others stay grey
Colour repeats what the sign already says, at three intensities depending on how far the value is from zero. It is never the only signal.
light
medium
strong
light
medium
strong
Price change: light up to 2%, medium up to 10%, strong above that.
Margins and growth: light up to 10%, medium up to 35%, strong above that.
Everything whose sign is not good or bad on its own stays grey: valuation (a low P/E can be a bargain or a trap, and almost every company here has just fallen), debt, size, insider ownership and short interest. Those are shown as-is, without the site taking a view.
Performance after being discarded
We keep tracking the price of the companies we discard so we can measure whether discarding them was a mistake.
Price when discarded
3.02 USD
Latest price
3.02
1-week return
pending
1-month return
pending
3-month return
pending
Status
tracking
Technical detail
This company stayed in preliminary screening: the Python filter picked it for its objective data and it was discarded before the qualitative analysis ever ran on it. That is why there is no analysis or risks of its own here: what was stored is an automatic text, identical across every card at this stage, and showing it as analysis would be misleading.
Catalyst
No catalyst recorded. (Next month)
Temporal causality
Status
Unclear: we could not find what caused the drop
Price move start
2026-09-04 14:30:00
Price move end
2026-09-04 18:30:00
Detection method
max_drawdown_over_60m_candles_48h_market_window
Primary catalyst
- (no date)
Temporal distance (min)
-
Overreaction gap
Gap
no data
Quantified impact
no data
Impact basis
-
Recovery scenario in the analysis (if reactivated)
Type
Fundamentals-driven
Horizon
14-56 days
Recovery level cited
100.0%
Technical support
Price has lost its 50-day average
Institutional flow
sin_datos
Non-assessable data (informational)
22.5
Auditable explanation
Why it showed up
Aparecio en el cribado de Radar Caídas por caida de 1 dia -8.21% y caida real en 48h de -11.82%; sin catalizador principal aislado por el motor de causalidad (estado: unclear).
Why it was researched
No requirio investigacion cualitativa adicional: la evidencia estructurada ya era suficiente.
Why it was discarded
Descartado (bucket 'rejected_temporal'): no se pudo confirmar un catalizador dentro de la ventana temporal exigida (motor de causalidad: recencia o anclaje del evento). Detalle registrado: No cumple la ventana temporal exigida o el motor de causalidad no confirma un catalizador reciente.
Se reactivaria como candidato si que se confirme un catalizador principal dentro de la ventana temporal exigida; que el checklist de subsanabilidad supere el minimo exigido (actual 1/10, minimo 7/10); que aparezca una fuente real que permita cuantificar el impacto del catalizador.